Northern Metropolitan Region Level Crossing Removals
Ms PATTEN (Northern Metropolitan) (18:29:59): My adjournment matter tonight is for the Minister for Planning, Minister Wynne, and the action I seek is for his office to urgently move to protect the heritage buildings and trees at risk due to the level crossing removals in my area.
In August I called on the Minister for Transport Infrastructure to meet directly with residents to hear their concerns about the proposed demolition of the historic signal boxes and the removal of trees at Gandolfo Gardens due to the Level Crossing Removal Project works in the Coburg area.
I also requested that the minister ensure they find an alternative site for their heavy machinery. And this is the thing—we have got these 108-year-old trees that are going to be removed so that the Level Crossing Removal Project trucks can be parked somewhere.
Those at the Level Crossing Removal Project say, ‘Well, it would cost us a lot of money to park our trucks somewhere else’.
Mr Somyurek interjected.
Ms PATTEN: This is for the Minister for Planning, thank you, Minister. The Minister for Transport Infrastructure did not act on either of my requests for a meeting so I am really calling on the Minister for Planning now to try to get this sorted, because I understand that he has intervened. Quite strangely he has sidelined the Heritage Council.
This was after the Heritage Council said that both the trees and the signal boxes should be protected. This is the week that we announced that we are not going to be logging in native forests, yet we are going to be knocking down 100-year-old trees.
So I ask if the minister will immediately step in to protect these historic signal boxes in Coburg and the 100-year-old trees in Gandolfo Gardens. The residents of Coburg have got less trees than pretty much any other suburb.
These trees are 108 years old. It took the community about 40 years to get these trees and these gardens established, and to say that they have to be knocked down so trucks can be parked for a $542 million project—surely we can find an alternative to this.
Fiona Patten MP
Leader of Reason
Member for Northern Metropolitan Region
Adjournment 14/11/19
Answer
Answered: 5 February 2020
Mr WYNNE (Richmond—Minister for Housing, Minister for Multicultural Affairs, Minister for Planning):
I note the concerns of Ms Patten in relation to the potential impacts of the Level Crossing Removal Project on heritage buildings and trees in the Coburg area.
The Bell-Moreland Level Crossing Removal Project includes proposed works within the Upfield Railway Line corridor, which is partially included in the Victorian Heritage Register and affected by heritage overlays under the Moreland Planning Scheme. Works are also proposed in Gandolfo Gardens within the Upfield Railway Line corridor which is affected by heritage overlays.
On 27 October 2019 I approved Amendment C178more to the Moreland Planning Scheme which facilitates the project by allowing the use and development of land in accordance with the specific control in the Bell and Moreland Level Crossing Removal Project Incorporated Document, October 2019.
The incorporated document requires that a report be prepared to my satisfaction that addresses the impact of development on the heritage significance of the following local heritage places: the Tinning Street railway gates; rail sidings on Colebrook Street; the Munro Street signal box; trees affected by Heritage Overlay (HO115)—Moreland Station Precinct; the Coburg substation, Munro Street; and roads within a Heritage Overlay where roadworks would change the appearance of the place.
On 20 November 2019 I determined to amend the State heritage registration for the Upfield Railway Line. The amendment affirms the State significance of the place is associated with the nineteenth century development of the line. This is consistent with the recommendations of Heritage Victoria and the Heritage Council of Victoria, who undertook independent assessments of the line against State heritage criteria.
The amended heritage place comprises station buildings and land at Jewell, Brunswick, Moreland and Coburg Stations, and individual gatekeepers’ cabins, signal boxes, gates and signals located between Park Street, Brunswick and Bell Street, Coburg. The amendment does not include the twentieth century features, or places unrelated to the Upfield Railway Line such as the Gandolfo Gardens.
Heritage approvals under the Heritage Act 2017 will be required for any proposed works that will impact on the cultural heritage significance of places included on the Victorian Heritage Register on the Upfield Railway Line.
I will carefully assess documents submitted for my approval in accordance with the requirements of the Moreland Planning Scheme.
Central Pier, Docklands
Ms PATTEN (Northern Metropolitan) (18:01:41): My adjournment matter this evening is for the Minister for Priority Precincts, and it concerns Docklands Central Pier.
The action I seek is for the minister to urgently provide support for the businesses and the employees at the pier. As many of you know, the pier was shut down urgently overnight on 28 August. That was two months ago.
Development Victoria has refused to share any information with the tenants there. They actually met with them on the 27th and did not mention that there were any concerns, and then on the 28th they were closed down and evacuated—and it has been that way since then.
The pier has been under investigation since 2013. Every two months engineers go down there. But now we hear from Development Victoria that they will not even be able to tell the tenants if they will be able to move back in. They will not even be able to tell them until 6 January.
This is the busiest time of the year. They have got 1300 employees.
They cannot even get insurance now for the properties and for the stuff that they have on the pier because no-one will insure them because they do not know the safety of the pier, so they are in this absolute catch 22 situation. We get a million guests down towards the pier at this time of year.
The businesses around Docklands are feeling the downturn on this, and we have got, as I say, 1300 workers that just do not know whether they are going to have a job before Christmas or even after Christmas. It is just really not good enough, and I think Development Victoria should really be doing what they can to assist effectively their tenants.
These are tenants who have been there since 2006 and have invested over $50 million in Central Pier, which has become quite an iconic location for visitors to Victoria. So I really cannot stress enough how much people are suffering as a result of Development Victoria’s inability to communicate and I think also recognise that they have an obligation to the tenants there and that by closing down the businesses people are losing literally millions of dollars.
It costs those tenants $2 million a month just to stay afloat down there. I call on the Minister for Priority Precincts to please step up and provide urgent and immediate support and information for the businesses and employees at Docklands Central Pier.
Fiona Patten MP
Leader of Reason
Member for Northern Metropolitan Region
Adjournment matter raised 31/10/19
Answer
Mr JENNINGS (South Eastern Metropolitan—Leader of the Government, Special Minister of State, Minister for Priority Precincts, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs):
I am advised that:
Development Victoria is the responsible authority and is also the landlord to the businesses located on Central Pier, Docklands.
Development Victoria had no option other than to close the pier for safety reasons after receiving expert engineering advice that the pier posed a potential safety risk. They acted quickly and decisively to protect the public.
The pier is currently closed until January 2020, following advice from specialist engineers that it will take approximately 15 weeks to fully assess the condition of the pier.
This work includes a detailed assessment of the piles by divers, inspection of the deck, localised repairs and testing on the top of the pier.
A decision about the future of Central Pier will only be made once a full assessment has been provided by the dive team and specialist engineers.
The ongoing safety of people working on and using the pier will be paramount in any decisions made about its future.
Development Victoria is in ongoing discussions with the head tenant, so that they can keep businesses and workers informed on relevant matters.
Development Victoria has arranged safe access for the businesses on the pier so that items could be removed.
Body Safety Australia
Ms PATTEN (Northern Metropolitan) (20:08:44):
My adjournment matter tonight is directed to the Minister for Education and concerns the group Body Safety Australia.
The action I seek is for the minister to increase funding to the program so it can be extended to regional areas. Body Safety Australia is a social enterprise that protects children from sexual abuse.
The group uses evidence-based strategies to provide age-appropriate sexual abuse prevention education to students, parents and teachers.
It is worth noting some facts about child sexual abuse. One in five children will experience childhood sexual abuse. On average children need to disclose five times before they are believed. Twenty-four per cent of female survivors were first abused by six years of age. Eighty-nine per cent of those cases will be perpetrated by a known offender. The internet is increasingly being used by predators to groom children.
The programs Body Safety Australia deliver complement the current Respectful Relationships curriculum and Child Safe Standards, and are provided to communities regardless of socio-economic status, religion, abilities, sexuality and/or family structure.
They have specialised knowledge and experience in orthodox and faith-based schools, special schools, LGBTIQ communities and people with different abilities, as well as people with different languages I understand that CEO Deanne Carson has been unsuccessful in seeking meetings with the education minister to discuss extending their funding to ensure that they can deliver their important programs to rural and regional areas.
I ask the education minister to provide ongoing funding to Body Safety, so that communities in regional areas can benefit from these vitally important programs.
Fiona Patten MP
Leader of Reason
Member for Northern Metropolitan Region
Adjournment debate 18/10/19
Answer
Mr MERLINO (Monbulk—Minister for Education):
I am informed as follows:
The Andrews Labor Government takes child safety very seriously. Victorian schools and early childhood services are required to comply with the Child Safe Standards, which are compulsory minimum standards to ensure that schools are well prepared to protect children from abuse. The Child Safe Standards are designed to ensure organisations have effective practices in place to prevent, respond to and report child abuse.
The Department of Education and Training has also developed the PROTECT website, which supports schools and early childhood services to embed the Victorian Child Safe Standards in their institutions. The PROTECT website includes detailed guidance on identifying and responding to child sexual abuse in schools and early childhood services. The Department also provides an interactive training module for school and early childhood services staff on recognising child abuse and their obligations to report abuse. These resources are available across Victoria.
Further, all government and Catholic schools teach respectful relationships education through the Victorian Curriculum to build students’ social and emotional skills including help seeking, resilience and problem solving. The Department supports schools to deliver this curriculum through the Resilience, Rights and Respectful Relationships teaching and learning materials, developed by education experts.
Schools are best placed to choose, in consultation with their community, how they use these and any other resources. While the Department does not fund Body Safety Australia, individual schools can make choices locally regarding whether they use Body Safety Australia resources or programs.
Crown Casino allegations
Ms PATTEN (Northern Metropolitan) (18:07:21):
My adjournment matter today is for the Premier, and it concerns further allegations—even more allegations—of illegal behaviour at Crown Casino.
These allegations have been made by former staff and whistleblowers within the regulator, the Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation.
The action I seek is for the Premier to urgently establish an inquiry to investigate these allegations and the many others that have come before.
On Monday I joined federal independent MP Andrew Wilkie in Canberra as we released video testimony from a former Crown employee detailing instances where he had witnessed activity such as the abuse of women, the transport of illegal drugs, the flouting of customs laws and more.
Today Mr Wilkie called for a federal royal commission, which was voted down by the major parties, who do not want to face this issue. Today documents and video leaked by whistleblowers from the casino regulator itself showed large amounts of money being laundered over the counter at the casino.
Crown can continue to say, ‘Nothing to see here’, but this is footage from their own cameras. They say that they are scrupulous and have a strong record of compliance, that we should not believe our own eyes and that we should take their word that it is all ‘fake news’.
Well, in that case they should welcome an inquiry to clear their name. The biggest travesty in all of this is that the public is not surprised by this behaviour at all. They just figure Crown is a mecca for illegal activity and nothing will be done because ex-politicians are on Crown’s payroll, they are on the board and they are their lobbyists, and the business simply pumps too much into our economy.
Well, they should be shocked, and they should be outraged. They should expect more from us. I ask the Premier: when is enough enough? When will this government act on what are clear breaches of our laws? This Parliament needs to restore some public faith in our systems, in our Parliament. So I am asking that the Premier acts.
This government must establish an inquiry into Crown to shine a light on what we have seen to date and whether this is, as one of the whistleblowers said, ‘just the tip of the iceberg’.
Fiona Patten MP
Leader of Reason
Member for Northern Metropolitan Region
Adjournment debate 15/10/19
Answer
Mr ANDREWS (Mulgrave—Premier):
The government has acted to investigate the allegations against Crown, and it is premature to establish an additional inquiry given the number of concurrent investigations into these allegations.
The Minister for Consumer Affairs, Gaming and Liquor Regulation has directed the Victorian Commission for Gambling and Liquor Regulation (VCGLR) to undertake an urgent investigation into the conduct of Crown. The VCGLR has reported to the Minister detailing the status of its continuing investigation. The VCGLR has also established an external review of Crown’s processes relating to junket operations.
Further to the VCGLR inquiry, the Minister has instructed the Department of Justice and Community Safety (DJCS) to review the regulatory framework for casino junket arrangements.
The VCGLR investigation is one of many investigations into the allegations against Crown that are currently underway. The VCGLR investigation is complemented by Commonwealth investigations which are being undertaken by the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity, the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission and the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre.
The Minister has also written to The Hon Christian Porter MP in his capacity as Attorney-General for Australia. In the Minister’s letter she confirmed that the VCGLR will cooperate fully with any other investigations, including those of the Commonwealth agencies.
The Minister has requested that the Commonwealth agencies promptly share any information relevant to the VCGLR’s functions in regulating Crown with the VCGLR.
Until the outcomes of these state and Commonwealth investigations are finalised it is premature to establish an additional inquiry.
Jesuit social services men’s project
Ms PATTEN (Northern Metropolitan) (18:03:18):
My adjournment matter is for the Minister for Prevention of Family Violence. It could have been equally directed to the Minister for Crime Prevention or the Minister for Mental Health as it relates to the Jesuit Social Services Men’s Project and the response to recommendations from the family violence royal commission.
The Jesuit Social Services’ Men’s Project has, not surprisingly to anyone, recognised and identified that we have a problem, and we have a problem with our men and boys. It is not all of them by any means, but nine out of 10 of our prisoners are male; on average, every 4 hours a male commits suicide; and 95 per cent of victims of violence experience that from a male perpetrator.
But, most importantly, these issues are completely connected to men’s attitudes to masculinity. This men’s project did a very interesting report into this. They basically found that men in the ‘man box’, and this actually accounts for 20 per cent to 30 per cent of the people that they surveyed—who agree or agree strongly that men should act tough, figure out their personal problems themselves and use aggression to get respect; that a man should never say no to sex; and that men should bring home the money, not women—are far more likely to perpetrate bullying, be involved in traffic accidents, perpetrate physical violence or sexual harassment and, given that it is World Suicide Prevention Day, have suicidal ideation.
When they looked at these men, 75 per cent of them were having suicidal ideation or suicidal thoughts. What Jesuit Social Services are asking for is a solution to this, and the solution to male suicide is to address masculinity attitudes.
The action tonight that I seek tonight is that the government explicitly recognise the influence that men’s attitudes towards masculinity can have on family violence and that the minister, in acting on the recommendations of the Men’s Project, develop a coordinated response to adolescent family violence pursuant to recommendations 123 to 128 of the royal commission.
Fiona Patten MP
Leader of Reason
Member for Northern Metropolitan Region
Adjournment matter raised 10/9/19
Answer
Ms WILLIAMS (Dandenong—Minister for Prevention of Family Violence, Minister for Women, Minister for Youth):
The Government is committed to strengthening responses to adolescent family violence.
In the 2018-19 Budget the Government committed $1.35 million over two years to strengthen and expand services that are working to reduce adolescent family violence. The investment responds to key recommendations made by the Royal Commission, including recommendations 123 and 128.
The investment has included:
• Expanding adolescent family violence services to more young people and their families in the Barwon and Bayside Peninsula areas where Orange Door sites have been established.
• The design and delivery of an Aboriginal specific service for adolescents who use violence in the home and within community in Mildura.
The 2019-20 Budget invested $85 million over four years and $22.4 million ongoing to community-based perpetrator interventions to over 5500 people each year.
People who use violence over the age of 18 are eligible to participate in a Men’s Behaviour Change Program, Perpetrator Case Management or trial programs that target particular cohorts including Aboriginal, CALD and LGBTIQ communities, women who use force and men with acquired brain injuries. These interventions incorporate a range of practice approaches including challenging gender stereotypes and promoting gender equality.
I have had the chance to hear directly from Jesuit Social Services and the excellent work they have done in this space through The Men’s Project and the Man Box. I was proud at the end of last year to launch OurWatch’s Men in Focus report which looked at masculinity. This report was informed by research from the work done by Jesuit Social Services through the Man Box.
Upfield line elevated rail
Ms PATTEN (Northern Metropolitan) (17:58:40):
My adjournment matter is for the Minister for Planning. There is a 91-year-old signal box near Coburg train station—it is on Munro Street—and it is set to be demolished to make way for sky rail. It was built in 1928; in fact it replaced an earlier box that was built there in 1892—127 years ago.
The Level Crossing Removal Project team has applied to Heritage Victoria to demolish the box, which has an interim protection order, and claims that building around the box would set the project back up to $10 million—a figure I just do not buy. It is overinflated.
For the record, I support the level crossing removals and even the sky rail projects in my electorate of Northern Metro, and I recently met with the team doing the planning for the Upfield line.
I have also met with residents concerned about what the end result would be. I was told directly by the level crossing removals team that community groups would have an opportunity for further input before final plans were released. So I was pretty disappointed and surprised to see the flashy videos online and design drawings in the Age.
It does not seem that community groups were further consulted, which is absolutely unacceptable. Now, a century-old railway signal box may not seem like paradise to most people, and we can pave over it and put up a parking lot, but remember, ‘Don’t it always seem to go that you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone’.
The action I seek is for the minister to review the heritage implications of allowing the demolition of the Munro Street signal box, to meet with community groups lobbying for more input along the Upfield line and to find a way to keep this valuable part of Coburg’s rich history.
Fiona Patten MP
Leader of Reason
Member for Northern Metropolitan Region
Adjournment matter raised 28/8/19
Answer
Mr WYNNE (Richmond—Minister for Housing, Minister for Multicultural Affairs, Minister for Planning):
The Heritage Act 2017 provides for public input in relation to the nomination of places and objects to the Victorian Heritage Register and permit applications for works and activities impacting heritage places.
In July 2019 Heritage Victoria received a nomination from a member of the public seeking to amend the existing Victorian Heritage Register extent for the Upfield Railway Line Precinct. This included the Munro Street signal box.
Heritage Victoria accepted the nomination and issued an Interim Protection Order to allow for the assessment of works related to the Bell-Moreland Level Crossing Removal Project. An Interim Protection Order allows for a permit application to be lodged with Heritage Victoria prior to a determination to amend or not amend the registration.
In August 2019 Heritage Victoria received an application from the Level Crossing Removal Project to demolish the signal box. This has been publicly advertised for 14 days, and Heritage Victoria is currently undertaking their assessment of the permit application.
The Heritage Act 2017 requires the Executive Director of Heritage Victoria to consider various matters in determining a permit application including the extent that the application, if approved, would affect the cultural heritage significance of the place; the extent that refusal would affect the reasonable or economic use of the place; and any submissions received in response to public advertisement of the permit application.
Questions regarding the consultation process for the Bell-Moreland Level Crossing Program should be directed to the Minister for Transport Infrastructure.
Hydromorphone trial
Ms PATTEN (Northern Metropolitan) (18:10:44):
My adjournment matter today is for the Minister for Mental Health, and the action I seek is for the minister to immediately introduce a hydromorphone trial as part of the medically supervised injecting centre.
Part of this is that I just want to read the following poem, which was written by a user of the MSIC who recently died.
His grief-stricken father, who would rather not be named here today, wrote to me to thank me and colleagues across the Parliament for supporting the injecting room—and to support a hydromorphone trial.
There is a great place us outcast drug users can go,
Where we can come to safely use our show.
A safe room to keep us alive,
And I want to share how much it means to me and everyone should know.
All are allowed young, mature and old,
As for dedication for my safety, the injecting room is sold.
Carefully the staff are there so we can safely inject,
Friendly without judgement for it’s our lives they protect.
Making sure if need be reversing an overdose effect.
All times friendly and helpful, they truly make an effort to connect.
Those who work here are surely worth much more than their weight in gold.
I feel warmly treated like family, the reception is never cold.
Now, three times they have saved my life, if not for this place I’d be in great strife.
So us users who tend to walk on the edge of a knife,
I advise you an OD never needs to end a life.
My admiration and respect for this caring crew I cannot portray in words,
More positive recognition each one deserves.
Sadly, this person could not use the centre at a time when it was shut, and he died. Marginalised heroin users spend most of their time trying to acquire heroin and the money to pay for it. In desperation, they turn to crime and they turn to drug trafficking. It is maintenance therapy, and it is chaotic.
If we had a hydromorphone trial, we would be able to improve the amenity of the area, reduce crime in the area, save people’s lives and move them onto a better path. So I seek the minister’s support for that.
Fiona Patten MP
Leader of Reason
Member for Northern Metropolitan Region
Adjournment matter raised 15/8/19
Answer
Mr FOLEY (Albert Park—Minister for Mental Health, Minister for Equality, Minister for Creative Industries):
This young man’s family contacted me recently and shared his poem with me. My thoughts are with all his family and friends for their terrible loss.
Alcohol and other drug problems—including those that result in overdose—are complex, affecting not just individuals but their families, their friends and their communities.
This is why, in 2019-20, the Government is investing a record $273.1 million in drug services, representing an increase in investment of 65 per cent through the last five State Budgets.
Pharmacotherapies such as methadone and buprenorphine are highly effective treatments for opioid dependence, and therefore a key part of this Government’s investment. We want to maximise the life-saving potential of pharmacotherapy.
The potential listing of new Long Acting Injectable Buprenorphine pharmacotherapy provides an opportunity to look at how new clinical products can be incorporated into existing pharmacotherapy services to support more people to successfully engage with harm reduction services.
These new treatment pathways and medications highlight the need to keep assessing new evidence for all treatment options for drug dependence, like hydromorphone.
We also need to minimise barriers to treatments that are already known to be effective. This includes advocating to the Commonwealth to remove systemic cost barriers by eliminating uncapped daily dispensing fees for methadone and buprenorphine and treating pharmacotherapy like all other subsidised medicines.
We will never stop working to reduce the harm drugs cause in communities across Victoria. We will never stop working to help individuals and families to tackle addiction, and ensure our community is safe.
Loneliness Strategy
Ms PATTEN (Northern Metropolitan) (18:30): My adjournment matter is for the Minister for Mental Health, Mr Foley, and the action I am seeking is for the minister to get in touch with the UK Parliament’s ‘minister for loneliness’ and consider developing a Victorian strategy for tackling loneliness. I have to say last week—in fact probably just the other day—I was in London and I met with the inaugural minister, Tracey Crouch, and spoke to her about how they had developed this strategy and what the basis was for it.
Loneliness really is a significant issue, not just in the UK but here as well. In fact Harvard University equates the health impact of loneliness with smoking 15 cigarettes a day—so a half-a-pack-a-day smoker. It is also linked to obesity. We know that people who are lonely turn up at emergency departments far more often than anyone else. So they have developed a strategy called A Connected Society: A Strategy for Tackling Loneliness—Laying the Foundations for Change, and it really is a brilliant cross-government strategy.
We know that society is changing and we live and work in very different ways. Employment practices have changed. We are living longer but not necessarily better. We may be working from long distances, we may have to move for our work, so we are finding that social isolation is an emerging issue, and in the UK they say somewhere around 18 per cent of people in the UK experience loneliness at some stage of their life, and I think the figure would be very similar in Victoria. As I mentioned, it is linked to obesity, coronary heart disease and stroke, and it is a precursor to depression, cognitive decline and an increase in Alzheimer’s, so it is a significant issue.
In the UK all ministers have had loneliness added to their portfolio. They are developing a measurement for loneliness. They are looking at how we plan cities, how we do new suburban planning, how we do housing, how we do transport. Even on the PBS they are doing social prescribing, so rather than prescribing a happy pill they are prescribing a whole range of different activities or volunteering.
I think this is a really good idea and I think it works alongside the Royal Commission into Victoria’s Mental Health System. We do not need to wait until that commission is finished. So, as I said, I would please ask the minister to reach out to Minister Davies in the UK and also look to develop a strategy for loneliness in Victoria.
Fiona Patten MP
Leader of Reason
Member for Northern Metropolitan Region
Adjournment matter raised 19/6/19
Indigenous culture at Melbourne Airport
MS PATTEN (Northern Metropolitan) (19:27:02):
My adjournment matter tonight is for the Minister for Tourism, Sport and Major Events, and the action I am seeking is for the minister to investigate having a greater presence of Indigenous culture at Melbourne’s Tullamarine airport.
Like many others, we travel in and out of that airport; we come through it hundreds of times. We know that literally millions of people visit our airport every year and hundreds of thousands visit every week.
But I have noticed as I have been coming in that there really is not a mark of our Indigenous culture at our airport. There might be a small Wominjeka sign, but most of it is filled with Chanel and George Clooney—I do not mind George Clooney, but it is very international. There is nothing particularly Victorian and particularly nothing for our First Nations people.
I am sure many of you have visited Auckland airport, Wellington airport, Vancouver airport, Toronto airport where there is a strong presence and a strong recognition that those are the lands of their First Nations.
I think that when tourists visit our country and when tourists visit our city they should understand that. We should have our First Nations people front and centre when people come to visit and land at our airports. We know that our Indigenous culture is a major tourist draw card to this nation and this state.
The action I am seeking from the minister is to review the welcome signage that we see at Tullamarine airport and other tourist information outlets at Melbourne’s main airport and to let me know how we can further emphasise our Indigenous culture on arrival to Melbourne.
Fiona Patten MP
Leader of Reason
Member for Northern Metropolitan Region
Adjournment matter raised 6/6/19
000 Mobile Phone App
MS PATTEN (Northern Metropolitan) (16:32:30):
My adjournment matter today is for the Minister for Crime Prevention, and the action I am seeking is a meeting with the minister, me and the Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority.
This is about a wonderful, innovative, new piece of technology that has recently been developed by Magistrate John O’Callaghan. He calls it the Triple 0 app; I would like to call it the O’Callaghan plan.
Essentially it is a mobile phone app that when activated will allow video and audio from your phone to go straight to 000. In other words, virtually every Victorian will have a CCTV camera in their pocket or handbag. You can imagine the possibilities of that.
If someone is being pursued or if someone at a fire or if someone is at an emergency, they can activate this app and the 000 operators will have visual access to the incident as well as being able to speak to the people there and be able to triangulate and pinpoint the person’s location.
There would also be the possibility of a blue light coming on so if a woman was being pursued, she could put the app on. This blue light would flash and you would have the operator from 000 saying, ‘Mate, back off. I know who you are. I’ve got a photo of you’.
It would actually act as a great deterrent to crime. In a week when many of us are thinking about the tragic death of Courtney Herron, we owe it to her to think of ways that we can prevent crime and we can prevent these tragedies.
As I say, the action I seek and I hope will happen is for the crime prevention minister to meet with me and the Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority to see how we can really move forward with this very innovative idea from Magistrate O’Callaghan.
Fiona Patten MP
Leader of Reason
Member for Northern Metropolitan Region
Adjournment matter 30/5/2019